criminal law cases 2018 - An Overview
criminal law cases 2018 - An Overview
Blog Article
Taking a person’s life is really a heinous crime that devastates family members, communities, and society in general. The severe punishment serves for a deterrent to probable offenders and seeks to copyright the sanctity of human life.
Unfortunately, that was not genuine. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son told his parents that the boy had molested him. The boy was arrested two days later, and admitted to getting sexually molested the couple’s son several times.
This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the conclusion or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court could interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mould the relief to really make it proper for the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified from the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID necessary) to criminal and traffic case information in the general district courts to the purpose of confirming an individual’s date of birth.
94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually properly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 times. When the appeal will not be decided within that timeframe, he/she will then tactic the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the ninety days with the department to act has already expired. To the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decision in the Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.
It allows individuals to research legal issues, understand their rights, and prepare for legal proceedings. This access is particularly important in Pakistan, where legal support may be pricey and challenging to get.
148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Provided the legal analysis on the topic issue, we have been of the view that the claim on the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally audio, Aside from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're subject matter to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the subject post allow the case on the petitioners for promotion may be regarded, however, we've been apparent in our point of view that contractual service cannot be deemed for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Conditioning, subject to availability of vacancy topic to check here your approval of the competent authority. Read more
The appellant should have remained vigilant and raised his challenge towards the Judgment within time. Read more
Normally, only an appeal accepted by the court of very last vacation resort will resolve such differences and, For lots of reasons, these appeals in many cases are not granted.
When the petitioner is actually present on the place of prevalence without causing any injury into the deceased or PWs then in such circumstances, whether He's vicariously liable shall be decided via the realized trial Court after recording of your evidence.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the load offered to any reported judgment may well rely on the reputation of both the reporter plus the judges.[seven]
In order to prove murder, there has to be an intention to cause the death of that person along with the action of actually injuring them – and that injury subsequently leading to and causing the death of that person.
If the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may possibly dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only done When the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and also the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as such they were nicely conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to get looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
a hundred and fifteen . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance with the respondents that pensionary benefits may very well be withheld on account of the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section 20 of your Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does supply for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced. These incorporate if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension might be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension may very well be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set via the government.